Seattle, WA water hardness
Seattle Public Utilities does not publish one hardness figure for Seattle. It publishes 2 separate figures, one per source, in its Seattle Public Utilities Quarterly Surface Water Analysis, May 2026 (2nd Quarter 2026). Across them the published numbers run from 0.5 to 1.73 grains per gallon (8.6 to 29.6 mg/L at 17.1 mg/L per grain). On the USGS scale those figures are all soft water, so the classification does not depend on which source serves an address. Every published figure is in the table below.
Every figure Seattle Public Utilities publishes, by source
These are the only hardness numbers this utility publishes. There is no system-wide figure to quote, so the figure plotted above is a midpoint we calculated from the lowest and highest of them, and it is labelled as such everywhere it appears.
| Source as published | mg/L (ppm) | Grains per gallon | USGS class |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cedar River supply (CLT-5 plant outlet and M-1A distribution) Distribution sample 1.55, plant outlet 1.73 grains/gallon. | 26.5–29.6 | 1.55–1.73 | Soft |
| Tolt River supply (TPT-3 plant outlet and B-2 distribution) Plant outlet 0.50, distribution sample 1.53 grains/gallon. | 8.6–26.2 | 0.5–1.53 | Soft |
Figures in the grains column are the utility's own where it published them. Where it published only one unit, the other column is our conversion at 17.1 mg/L per grain, and the row above says which. Nothing in this table is averaged across sources.
The published figures, exactly as they appear
This is the hardness line transcribed from the source, with nothing added:
Cedar — CLT-5 Cedar Treatment Plant Outlet, M-1A Cedar Distribution: Hardness, Grains 1.73 1.55 Grains/gallon; Calcium Hardness 26.4 24.3 mg CaCO3/L. Tolt — TPT-3 Tolt Treatment Plant Outlet, B-2 Tolt Distribution: Hardness, Grains 0.50 1.53 Grains/gallon; Calcium Hardness 24.0 26.2 mg CaCO3/L
Seattle Public Utilities, Seattle Public Utilities Quarterly Surface Water Analysis, May 2026 (2nd Quarter 2026)
Units as published: grains/gallon (a separate “Calcium Hardness” row is given in mg CaCO3/L). What kind of figure it is: figures for each source, with no system-wide figure. Retrieved 2026-10-26.
Seattle hardness in mg/L and grains per gallon
Water-quality reports use mg/L (identical to ppm). Softener instructions and plumbing specifications use grains per gallon. Both are below. Where a figure is our arithmetic rather than the utility's own number, it says so.
| Figure | mg/L (ppm) | Grains per gallon | Whose number |
|---|---|---|---|
| Low end of published span across areas | 8.6 | 0.5 | gpg published, mg/L is our conversion |
| High end of published span across areas | 29.6 | 1.73 | gpg published, mg/L is our conversion |
| Plotted on the scale above | 19.1 | 1.1 | midpoint of the lowest and highest figures published across this system's 2 areas; the utility publishes no system-wide figure, so this midpoint is not one of its numbers, converted at 17.1 mg/L per gpg; the gpg here is our conversion at 17.1, so it can differ slightly from a utility’s own rounded gpg figure |
The conversion, both ways: gpg = mg/L ÷ 17.1 and mg/L = gpg × 17.1. Worked for this system: 19.1 ÷ 17.1 = 1.1 gpg. The converter does °dH and °f as well, and why the factor is 17.1 explains where the number comes from.
What this figure does not tell you
Service area and source water
| Utility | Seattle Public Utilities |
|---|---|
| Service area as published | Seattle, which SPU serves from two supplies. Per SPU's analyses page, more than 80 percent of Seattle residences receive Cedar River water; Broadview, Bitter Lake, Crown Hill, Northgate, Haller Lake, Pinehurst and parts of Maple Leaf, Wedgewood, Greenwood, View Ridge and Roosevelt regularly receive Tolt water. |
| Source water | The Cedar River and the South Fork Tolt River. |
Provenance of every number on this page
| Source document | Seattle Public Utilities Quarterly Surface Water Analysis, May 2026 (2nd Quarter 2026) |
|---|---|
| Source URL | https://www.seattle.gov/documents/Departments/SPU/Services/Water/Analyses/SPU_Quarterly-Surface-Water-Analysis_05-20-2026.pdf |
| Published by | Seattle Public Utilities |
| Report year | 2026 |
| Year note | One sampling event: samples collected on May 19 and May 20, 2026. The document is labelled “Non-regulatory data. Informational only”. |
| Retrieved | 2026-10-26 |
| Classification bands | USGS Water Science School, retrieved 2026-10-16 |
Notes the report forces on this page
- These figures are from one sampling event (May 19-20, 2026) at two points per supply, which SPU labels non-regulatory and informational only. They are not an annual average and not a range over the year.
- SPU's 2025 Drinking Water Quality Report carries no hardness line; the quarterly surface water analyses are where SPU publishes one.
- SPU's two units do not agree for the Tolt plant outlet. It prints “Hardness, Grains” of 0.50 grains/gallon (about 8.6 mg/L) beside a “Calcium Hardness” of 24.0 mg CaCO3/L, and calcium hardness alone cannot exceed total hardness; 24.0 mg/L is about 1.4 grains/gallon. Both are reproduced as published and neither is adjusted. The other three sampling points are closer: Cedar outlet 1.73 grains/gallon beside 26.4 mg/L calcium hardness, Cedar distribution 1.55 beside 24.3, Tolt distribution 1.53 beside 26.2.
- Every published figure here is soft on the USGS scale, so the discrepancy does not change the classification.
- The plotted point is the midpoint of the lowest and highest grains-per-gallon figures across the two supplies, converted at 17.1 mg/L per grain. It is not a figure SPU published.
- Other report years checked on 2026-10-26: 2025 (no hardness line).
If you are sizing a softener for Seattle water
At 1.1 gpg, the sizing arithmetic starts from your household's water use, not from the hardness alone. The calculator below is pre-filled with this system's figure and every other input is an editable assumption.
Whether a softener is worth installing at this hardness is a judgement, not arithmetic, and it is not one this site makes for you. Nothing here has been tested by the author.
Where Seattle sits against other verified systems
- Portland, OR 9 mg/L 0.5 gpg Soft
- Boston, MA 16 mg/L 1 gpg Soft
- Manchester, NH 17.9 mg/L 1 gpg Soft
- Seattle, WA 19.1 mg/L 1.1 gpg Soft
- Raleigh, NC 25 mg/L 1.47 gpg Soft
- New York, NY 32 mg/L 2 gpg Soft
- Charlotte, NC 32 mg/L 1.9 gpg Soft
- Memphis, TN 46 mg/L 2.7 gpg Soft
- Norfolk, VA 48 mg/L 2.8 gpg Soft
- Anchorage, AK 56 mg/L 3.3 gpg Soft
- Virginia Beach, VA 56 mg/L 3.3 gpg Soft
- Oakland, CA 68.4 mg/L 4 gpg Moderately hard
- Nashville, TN 77.3 mg/L 4.5 gpg Moderately hard
- Sacramento, CA 83 mg/L 4.9 gpg Moderately hard
- Fresno, CA 89.3 mg/L 5.2 gpg Moderately hard
- Saint Paul, MN 90 mg/L 5 gpg Moderately hard
- Austin, TX 93 mg/L 5.4 gpg Moderately hard
- Minneapolis, MN 94 mg/L 5.5 gpg Moderately hard
- Washington, DC 95 mg/L 5.6 gpg Moderately hard
- Baltimore, MD 97.5 mg/L 5.7 gpg Moderately hard
- Birmingham, AL 98 mg/L 5.7 gpg Moderately hard
- Kansas City, MO 100 mg/L 5.8 gpg Moderately hard
- Denver, CO 105 mg/L 6.1 gpg Moderately hard
- Detroit, MI 107 mg/L 6.3 gpg Moderately hard
- Aurora, CO 113 mg/L 6.6 gpg Moderately hard
- Tulsa, OK 114.5 mg/L 6.7 gpg Moderately hard
- Louisville, KY 115 mg/L 6.7 gpg Moderately hard
- Columbus, OH 120 mg/L 7 gpg Moderately hard
- Cleveland, OH 120 mg/L 7 gpg Moderately hard
- Philadelphia, PA 125 mg/L 7.3 gpg Hard
- Ann Arbor, MI 126 mg/L 7.4 gpg Hard
- Cincinnati, OH 133 mg/L 7.8 gpg Hard
- Chicago, IL 134.5 mg/L 7.9 gpg Hard
- Houston, TX 135.5 mg/L 7.9 gpg Hard
- Milwaukee, WI 137 mg/L 8.01 gpg Hard
- St. Louis, MO 138 mg/L 8.1 gpg Hard
- Grand Rapids, MI 142 mg/L 8.3 gpg Hard
- Fort Worth, TX 145 mg/L 8.5 gpg Hard
- Spokane, WA 159 mg/L 9.3 gpg Hard
- Honolulu, HI 162.5 mg/L 9.5 gpg Hard
- Wichita, KS 170 mg/L 9.9 gpg Hard
- Omaha, NE 170 mg/L 10 gpg Hard
- Los Angeles, CA 192 mg/L 11.2 gpg Very hard
- Lincoln, NE 192 mg/L 11.2 gpg Very hard
- Riverside, CA 197 mg/L 12 gpg Very hard
- Tampa, FL 220 mg/L 12.9 gpg Very hard
- Phoenix, AZ 237 mg/L 13.9 gpg Very hard
- Mesa, AZ 239.4 mg/L 14 gpg Very hard
- Round Rock, TX 258 mg/L 15.1 gpg Very hard
- Pflugerville, TX 267 mg/L 15.6 gpg Very hard
- San Diego, CA 276 mg/L 16 gpg Very hard
- Las Vegas, NV 280 mg/L 16 gpg Very hard
- Chandler, AZ 282.2 mg/L 16.5 gpg Very hard
- San Antonio, TX 299.3 mg/L 17.5 gpg Very hard
- Anaheim, CA 300 mg/L 18 gpg Very hard
- Henderson, NV 304 mg/L 18 gpg Very hard
- Indianapolis, IN 317 mg/L 19 gpg Very hard
- Madison, WI 324.9 mg/L 19 gpg Very hard
- Scottsdale, AZ 352.5 mg/L 20.6 gpg Very hard
- Salt Lake City, UT 353.5 mg/L 20.7 gpg Very hard
mg/L as calcium carbonate. Each classification band is drawn the same width, so the axis is not linear in mg/L.
Systems with similar published hardness
- Manchester, NH Manchester Water Works, 17.9 mg/L (1 gpg)
- Boston, MA Massachusetts Water Resources Authority (MWRA), 16 mg/L (0.9 gpg)
- Raleigh, NC Raleigh Water, 25 mg/L (1.5 gpg)
- Portland, OR Portland Water Bureau, 9 mg/L (0.5 gpg)
All 60 verified systems How to find hardness in your own utility's report If you are on a well instead