Utilities / Texas

Austin, TX water hardness

Austin Water publishes an average hardness of 93 mg/L (5.4 grains per gallon, also its own figure) for its system, in its Austin Water 2025 Water Quality Report. On the USGS scale that is moderately hard water.

Soft Moderate Hard Very hard 0 60 120 180 500+ 93 mg/L Austin, TX sits in the moderately hard band mg/L as CaCO₃. Bands drawn equal width, so the axis is not linear.
Austin Water published an average of 93 mg/L, with a published range of 70 to 126 mg/L shown as the bar. The plotted point is the published average. Classification bands from the USGS Water Science School.

The published figure, exactly as it appears

This is the hardness line transcribed from the source, with nothing added:

Total Hardness (as CaCO3) — Low 70 ppm (mg/L) [4.1 gpg], High 126 ppm (mg/L) [7.4 gpg], Average 93 ppm (mg/L) [5.4 gpg]

Austin Water, Austin Water 2025 Water Quality Report

Units as published: ppm (mg/L), with gpg given alongside. What kind of figure it is: an average with a range. Retrieved 2026-10-16.

Austin hardness in mg/L and grains per gallon

Water-quality reports use mg/L (identical to ppm). Softener instructions and plumbing specifications use grains per gallon. Both are below. Where a figure is our arithmetic rather than the utility's own number, it says so.

Figuremg/L (ppm)Grains per gallonWhose number
Published average935.4both published by the utility
Low end of published range704.1mg/L published, gpg is our conversion
High end of published range1267.4mg/L published, gpg is our conversion
Plotted on the scale above935.4published average; the gpg here is our conversion at 17.1, so it can differ slightly from a utility’s own rounded gpg figure

The conversion, both ways: gpg = mg/L ÷ 17.1 and mg/L = gpg × 17.1. Worked for this system: 93 ÷ 17.1 = 5.4 gpg. The converter does °dH and °f as well, and why the factor is 17.1 explains where the number comes from.

What this figure does not tell you

Service area and source water

UtilityAustin Water
Service area as publishedAustin Water's drinking water service area. The report publishes one set of system figures, not per-neighbourhood values.

Provenance of every number on this page

Source documentAustin Water 2025 Water Quality Report
Source URLhttps://www.austintexas.gov/water/water-quality-reports
Published byAustin Water, City of Austin
Report year2025
Year noteHardness row carries the report's note 'Sampled in 2025 unless noted differently.'
Retrieved2026-10-16
Classification bandsUSGS Water Science School, retrieved 2026-10-16

Notes the report forces on this page

If you are sizing a softener for Austin water

At 5.4 gpg, the sizing arithmetic starts from your household's water use, not from the hardness alone. The calculator below is pre-filled with this system's figure and every other input is an editable assumption.

Whether a softener is worth installing at this hardness is a judgement, not arithmetic, and it is not one this site makes for you. Nothing here has been tested by the author.

Where Austin sits against other verified systems

Soft Soft 0–60
Moderately hard Moderate 61–120
Hard Hard 121–180
Very hard Very hard 181+
  1. Portland, OR 9 mg/L 0.5 gpg Soft
  2. Boston, MA 16 mg/L 1 gpg Soft
  3. Manchester, NH 17.9 mg/L 1 gpg Soft
  4. New York, NY 32 mg/L 2 gpg Soft
  5. Austin, TX 93 mg/L 5.4 gpg Moderately hard
  6. Denver, CO 105 mg/L 6.1 gpg Moderately hard
  7. Phoenix, AZ 237 mg/L 13.9 gpg Very hard
  8. Las Vegas, NV 280 mg/L 16 gpg Very hard
  9. San Antonio, TX 299.3 mg/L 17.5 gpg Very hard
  10. Indianapolis, IN 317 mg/L 19 gpg Very hard

mg/L as calcium carbonate. Each classification band is drawn the same width, so the axis is not linear in mg/L.

Austin, TX is the highlighted row. Every other system on this chart has its own page with its own published figure and report date. Grains per gallon are the utility's own figure where it published one, and our conversion at 17.1 mg/L per grain where it did not.

Systems with similar published hardness

All 10 verified systems   How to find hardness in your own utility's report   If you are on a well instead