Utilities / California

Los Angeles, CA water hardness

Los Angeles Department of Water and Power does not publish one hardness figure for Los Angeles. It publishes 3 separate figures, one per area, in its LADWP Water Quality FAQs, “How hard is my water?”. Across them the published numbers run from 93 to 291 mg/L. On the USGS scale those figures are not all in one class: they span moderately hard, hard and very hard water, so which class describes an address depends on which area serves it. Every published figure is in the table below.

Soft Moderate Hard Very hard 0 60 120 180 500+ 192 mg/L Los Angeles, CA spans 3 published areas across the moderately hard to very hard bands mg/L as CaCO₃. Bands drawn equal width, so the axis is not linear.
Los Angeles Department of Water and Power published a figure for each of 3 areas rather than one for the system; the bar spans the lowest and highest of those published figures, 93 to 291 mg/L. The plotted point is the midpoint of the lowest and highest figures published across this system's 3 areas; the utility publishes no system-wide figure, so this midpoint is not one of its numbers. Classification bands from the USGS Water Science School.

Every figure Los Angeles Department of Water and Power publishes, by area

These are the only hardness numbers this utility publishes. There is no system-wide figure to quote, so the figure plotted above is a midpoint we calculated from the lowest and highest of them, and it is labelled as such everywhere it appears.

Area as publishedmg/L (ppm)Grains per gallonUSGS class
San Fernando Valley and Western Los Angeles 147, range 93–275 8.6, range 5.4–16.1 Hard
Silver Lake, Downtown and South Los Angeles 168, range 93–291 9.8, range 5.4–17 Hard
Eastern Los Angeles and the Harbor 279, range 275–281 16.3, range 16.1–16.4 Very hard

Figures in the grains column are the utility's own where it published them. Where it published only one unit, the other column is our conversion at 17.1 mg/L per grain, and the row above says which. Nothing in this table is averaged across areas.

The published figures, exactly as they appear

This is the hardness line transcribed from the source, with nothing added:

Hardness values by Water Quality Areas | Average | Range — San Fernando Valley and Western Los Angeles | 8.6 grains per gallon (147 mg/L as CaCO3) | 5.4 – 16.1 grains per gallon (93 – 275 mg/L as CaCO3); Silver Lake, Downtown and South Los Angeles | 9.8 grains per gallon (168 mg/L as CaCO3) | 5.4 – 17.0 grains per gallon (93– 291 mg/L as CaCO3); Eastern Los Angeles and the Harbor | 16.3 grains per gallon (279 mg/L as CaCO3) | 16.1 – 16.4 grains per gallon (275 – 281 mg/L as CaCO3)

Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, LADWP Water Quality FAQs, “How hard is my water?”

Units as published: grains per gallon, with mg/L as CaCO₃ given alongside. What kind of figure it is: a single value. Retrieved 2026-10-17.

Los Angeles hardness in mg/L and grains per gallon

Water-quality reports use mg/L (identical to ppm). Softener instructions and plumbing specifications use grains per gallon. Both are below. Where a figure is our arithmetic rather than the utility's own number, it says so.

Figuremg/L (ppm)Grains per gallonWhose number
Low end of published span across areas935.4both published by the utility
High end of published span across areas29117both published by the utility
Plotted on the scale above19211.2midpoint of the lowest and highest figures published across this system's 3 areas; the utility publishes no system-wide figure, so this midpoint is not one of its numbers; the gpg here is our conversion at 17.1, so it can differ slightly from a utility’s own rounded gpg figure

The conversion, both ways: gpg = mg/L ÷ 17.1 and mg/L = gpg × 17.1. Worked for this system: 192 ÷ 17.1 = 11.2 gpg. The converter does °dH and °f as well, and why the factor is 17.1 explains where the number comes from.

What this figure does not tell you

Service area and source water

UtilityLos Angeles Department of Water and Power
Service area as publishedThe City of Los Angeles, which LADWP divides into three water quality areas for this purpose. The FAQ states that most areas can receive any of LADWP's water supplies during repairs or emergencies.

Provenance of every number on this page

Source documentLADWP Water Quality FAQs, “How hard is my water?”
Source URLhttps://www.ladwp.com/who-we-are/water-system/water-quality/water-quality-faqs
Published byLos Angeles Department of Water and Power
Report year2022
Year noteThe FAQ answer introduces the figures with “The following information is from 2022”. The page itself carries no publication date.
Retrieved2026-10-17
Classification bandsUSGS Water Science School, retrieved 2026-10-16

Notes the report forces on this page

If you are sizing a softener for Los Angeles water

At 11.2 gpg, the sizing arithmetic starts from your household's water use, not from the hardness alone. The calculator below is pre-filled with this system's figure and every other input is an editable assumption.

Whether a softener is worth installing at this hardness is a judgement, not arithmetic, and it is not one this site makes for you. Nothing here has been tested by the author.

Where Los Angeles sits against other verified systems

Soft Soft 0–60
Moderately hard Moderate 61–120
Hard Hard 121–180
Very hard Very hard 181+
  1. Portland, OR 9 mg/L 0.5 gpg Soft
  2. Boston, MA 16 mg/L 1 gpg Soft
  3. Manchester, NH 17.9 mg/L 1 gpg Soft
  4. Raleigh, NC 25 mg/L 1.47 gpg Soft
  5. New York, NY 32 mg/L 2 gpg Soft
  6. Charlotte, NC 32 mg/L 1.9 gpg Soft
  7. Memphis, TN 46 mg/L 2.7 gpg Soft
  8. Anchorage, AK 56 mg/L 3.3 gpg Soft
  9. Oakland, CA 68.4 mg/L 4 gpg Moderately hard
  10. Nashville, TN 77.3 mg/L 4.5 gpg Moderately hard
  11. Sacramento, CA 83 mg/L 4.9 gpg Moderately hard
  12. Fresno, CA 89.3 mg/L 5.2 gpg Moderately hard
  13. Saint Paul, MN 90 mg/L 5 gpg Moderately hard
  14. Austin, TX 93 mg/L 5.4 gpg Moderately hard
  15. Washington, DC 95 mg/L 5.6 gpg Moderately hard
  16. Birmingham, AL 98 mg/L 5.7 gpg Moderately hard
  17. Kansas City, MO 100 mg/L 5.8 gpg Moderately hard
  18. Denver, CO 105 mg/L 6.1 gpg Moderately hard
  19. Tulsa, OK 114.5 mg/L 6.7 gpg Moderately hard
  20. Louisville, KY 115 mg/L 6.7 gpg Moderately hard
  21. Columbus, OH 120 mg/L 7 gpg Moderately hard
  22. Cleveland, OH 120 mg/L 7 gpg Moderately hard
  23. Philadelphia, PA 125 mg/L 7.3 gpg Hard
  24. Ann Arbor, MI 126 mg/L 7.4 gpg Hard
  25. Cincinnati, OH 133 mg/L 7.8 gpg Hard
  26. Milwaukee, WI 137 mg/L 8.01 gpg Hard
  27. St. Louis, MO 138 mg/L 8.1 gpg Hard
  28. Fort Worth, TX 145 mg/L 8.5 gpg Hard
  29. Honolulu, HI 162.5 mg/L 9.5 gpg Hard
  30. Wichita, KS 170 mg/L 9.9 gpg Hard
  31. Omaha, NE 170 mg/L 10 gpg Hard
  32. Los Angeles, CA 192 mg/L 11.2 gpg Very hard
  33. Lincoln, NE 192 mg/L 11.2 gpg Very hard
  34. Tampa, FL 220 mg/L 12.9 gpg Very hard
  35. Phoenix, AZ 237 mg/L 13.9 gpg Very hard
  36. Mesa, AZ 239.4 mg/L 14 gpg Very hard
  37. San Diego, CA 276 mg/L 16 gpg Very hard
  38. Las Vegas, NV 280 mg/L 16 gpg Very hard
  39. Chandler, AZ 282.2 mg/L 16.5 gpg Very hard
  40. San Antonio, TX 299.3 mg/L 17.5 gpg Very hard
  41. Anaheim, CA 300 mg/L 18 gpg Very hard
  42. Indianapolis, IN 317 mg/L 19 gpg Very hard
  43. Madison, WI 324.9 mg/L 19 gpg Very hard
  44. Scottsdale, AZ 352.5 mg/L 20.6 gpg Very hard

mg/L as calcium carbonate. Each classification band is drawn the same width, so the axis is not linear in mg/L.

Los Angeles, CA is the highlighted row. Every other system on this chart has its own page with its own published figure and report date. Grains per gallon are the utility's own figure where it published one, and our conversion at 17.1 mg/L per grain where it did not.

Systems with similar published hardness

All 44 verified systems   How to find hardness in your own utility's report   If you are on a well instead