Utilities / New York

New York, NY water hardness

New York City Department of Environmental Protection (NYC DEP) publishes an average hardness of 32 mg/L (2 grains per gallon, also its own figure) for its system, in its New York City Drinking Water Supply and Quality Report 2025. On the USGS scale that is soft water.

Soft Moderate Hard Very hard 0 60 120 180 500+ 32 mg/L New York, NY sits in the soft band mg/L as CaCO₃. Bands drawn equal width, so the axis is not linear.
New York City Department of Environmental Protection (NYC DEP) published an average of 32 mg/L, with a published range of 18 to 100 mg/L shown as the bar. The plotted point is the published average. Classification bands from the USGS Water Science School.

The published figure, exactly as it appears

This is the hardness line transcribed from the source, with nothing added:

Hardness (mg/L CaCO3) — # SAMPLES 313, RANGE 18 - 100, AVERAGE 32, MCL VIOLATION No, LIKELY SOURCES Erosion of natural deposits | Hardness (grains/gallon[US]CaCO3) — # SAMPLES 313, RANGE 1 - 6, AVERAGE 2

New York City Department of Environmental Protection (NYC DEP), New York City Drinking Water Supply and Quality Report 2025

Units as published: mg/L CaCO3, with grains/gallon (US) CaCO3 given in a second row. What kind of figure it is: an average with a range. Retrieved 2026-10-16.

New York hardness in mg/L and grains per gallon

Water-quality reports use mg/L (identical to ppm). Softener instructions and plumbing specifications use grains per gallon. Both are below. Where a figure is our arithmetic rather than the utility's own number, it says so.

Figuremg/L (ppm)Grains per gallonWhose number
Published average322both published by the utility
Low end of published range181mg/L published, gpg is our conversion
High end of published range1006mg/L published, gpg is our conversion
Plotted on the scale above321.9published average; the gpg here is our conversion at 17.1, so it can differ slightly from a utility’s own rounded gpg figure

The conversion, both ways: gpg = mg/L ÷ 17.1 and mg/L = gpg × 17.1. Worked for this system: 32 ÷ 17.1 = 1.9 gpg. The converter does °dH and °f as well, and why the factor is 17.1 explains where the number comes from.

What this figure does not tell you

Service area and source water

UtilityNew York City Department of Environmental Protection (NYC DEP)
Service area as publishedThe report states that the Catskill/Delaware and Croton supplies were the only sources of water in 2025. Which supply reaches a given address varies, and the Croton supply is the harder of the two, which is part of why the published range is wide.
Source waterThe Catskill/Delaware and Croton supplies.
Samples behind the figure313

Provenance of every number on this page

Source documentNew York City Drinking Water Supply and Quality Report 2025
Source URLhttps://www.nyc.gov/assets/dep/downloads/pdf/water/drinking-water/drinking-water-supply-quality-report/2025-drinking-water-supply-quality-report.pdf
Published byNew York City Department of Environmental Protection
Report year2025
Year noteHardness appears in the 2025 'Detected Conventional Physical and Chemical Parameters' table, from 313 samples. The report states the data illustrate that in 2025 New York City's drinking water continued to be of excellent quality.
Retrieved2026-10-16
Classification bandsUSGS Water Science School, retrieved 2026-10-16

Notes the report forces on this page

If you are sizing a softener for New York water

At 2 gpg, the sizing arithmetic starts from your household's water use, not from the hardness alone. The calculator below is pre-filled with this system's figure and every other input is an editable assumption.

Whether a softener is worth installing at this hardness is a judgement, not arithmetic, and it is not one this site makes for you. Nothing here has been tested by the author.

Where New York sits against other verified systems

Soft Soft 0–60
Moderately hard Moderate 61–120
Hard Hard 121–180
Very hard Very hard 181+
  1. Portland, OR 9 mg/L 0.5 gpg Soft
  2. Boston, MA 16 mg/L 1 gpg Soft
  3. Manchester, NH 17.9 mg/L 1 gpg Soft
  4. New York, NY 32 mg/L 2 gpg Soft
  5. Austin, TX 93 mg/L 5.4 gpg Moderately hard
  6. Denver, CO 105 mg/L 6.1 gpg Moderately hard
  7. Phoenix, AZ 237 mg/L 13.9 gpg Very hard
  8. Las Vegas, NV 280 mg/L 16 gpg Very hard
  9. San Antonio, TX 299.3 mg/L 17.5 gpg Very hard
  10. Indianapolis, IN 317 mg/L 19 gpg Very hard

mg/L as calcium carbonate. Each classification band is drawn the same width, so the axis is not linear in mg/L.

New York, NY is the highlighted row. Every other system on this chart has its own page with its own published figure and report date. Grains per gallon are the utility's own figure where it published one, and our conversion at 17.1 mg/L per grain where it did not.

Systems with similar published hardness

All 10 verified systems   How to find hardness in your own utility's report   If you are on a well instead