Scottsdale, AZ water hardness
Scottsdale Water does not publish one hardness figure for Scottsdale. It publishes 3 separate figures, one per area, on the page cited below. Across them the published numbers run from 275 to 430 mg/L. On the USGS scale those figures are all very hard water, so the classification does not depend on which area serves an address. Every published figure is in the table below.
Every figure Scottsdale Water publishes, by area
These are the only hardness numbers this utility publishes. There is no system-wide figure to quote, so the figure plotted above is a midpoint we calculated from the lowest and highest of them, and it is labelled as such everywhere it appears.
| Area as published | mg/L (ppm) | Grains per gallon | USGS class |
|---|---|---|---|
| North of Chaparral Road | 275–300 | 16–18 | Very hard |
| Indian School Road to Chaparral Road | 340–370 | 20–22 | Very hard |
| South of Indian School Road | 370–430 | 22–25 | Very hard |
Figures in the grains column are the utility's own where it published them. Where it published only one unit, the other column is our conversion at 17.1 mg/L per grain, and the row above says which. Nothing in this table is averaged across areas.
The published figures, exactly as they appear
This is the hardness line transcribed from the source, with nothing added:
Boundary | Hardness (gpg) | Hardness (mg/L) — South of Indian School Road | 22 - 25 | 370 - 430; Indian School Road to Chaparral Road | 20 - 22 | 340 - 370; North of Chaparral Road | 16 - 18 | 275 - 300
Scottsdale Water
Units as published: gpg and mg/L. What kind of figure it is: a single value. Retrieved 2026-10-17.
Scottsdale hardness in mg/L and grains per gallon
Water-quality reports use mg/L (identical to ppm). Softener instructions and plumbing specifications use grains per gallon. Both are below. Where a figure is our arithmetic rather than the utility's own number, it says so.
| Figure | mg/L (ppm) | Grains per gallon | Whose number |
|---|---|---|---|
| Low end of published span across areas | 275 | 16 | both published by the utility |
| High end of published span across areas | 430 | 25 | both published by the utility |
| Plotted on the scale above | 352.5 | 20.6 | midpoint of the lowest and highest figures published across this system's 3 areas; the utility publishes no system-wide figure, so this midpoint is not one of its numbers; the gpg here is our conversion at 17.1, so it can differ slightly from a utility’s own rounded gpg figure |
The conversion, both ways: gpg = mg/L ÷ 17.1 and mg/L = gpg × 17.1. Worked for this system: 352.5 ÷ 17.1 = 20.6 gpg. The converter does °dH and °f as well, and why the factor is 17.1 explains where the number comes from.
What this figure does not tell you
Service area and source water
| Utility | Scottsdale Water |
|---|---|
| Service area as published | Scottsdale Water's service area, divided in the fact sheet by three road boundaries. The fact sheet names no treatment plant for any area. |
Provenance of every number on this page
| Source document | Scottsdale Water, “Hard Water” fact sheet |
|---|---|
| Source URL | https://www.scottsdaleaz.gov/docs/default-source/scottsdaleaz/water/water-quality/hard-water-fact-sheet.pdf?sfvrsn=a4fb4a24_2 |
| Published by | Scottsdale Water |
| Report year | Not stated on the source page |
| Year note | The fact sheet states no year and cites no report. |
| Retrieved | 2026-10-17 |
| Classification bands | USGS Water Science School, retrieved 2026-10-16 |
Notes the report forces on this page
- Scottsdale publishes a range per area and no average anywhere. The plotted point is the midpoint of the lowest and highest numbers across the three published area ranges and is not itself a Scottsdale number.
- All three areas fall in the USGS very hard band, so the classification on this page does not depend on which area serves an address.
- The fact sheet states no year, so these figures cannot be tied to a sampling period.
If you are sizing a softener for Scottsdale water
At 20.6 gpg, the sizing arithmetic starts from your household's water use, not from the hardness alone. The calculator below is pre-filled with this system's figure and every other input is an editable assumption.
Whether a softener is worth installing at this hardness is a judgement, not arithmetic, and it is not one this site makes for you. Nothing here has been tested by the author.
Where Scottsdale sits against other verified systems
- Portland, OR 9 mg/L 0.5 gpg Soft
- Boston, MA 16 mg/L 1 gpg Soft
- Manchester, NH 17.9 mg/L 1 gpg Soft
- Raleigh, NC 25 mg/L 1.47 gpg Soft
- New York, NY 32 mg/L 2 gpg Soft
- Charlotte, NC 32 mg/L 1.9 gpg Soft
- Memphis, TN 46 mg/L 2.7 gpg Soft
- Anchorage, AK 56 mg/L 3.3 gpg Soft
- Oakland, CA 68.4 mg/L 4 gpg Moderately hard
- Nashville, TN 77.3 mg/L 4.5 gpg Moderately hard
- Sacramento, CA 83 mg/L 4.9 gpg Moderately hard
- Fresno, CA 89.3 mg/L 5.2 gpg Moderately hard
- Saint Paul, MN 90 mg/L 5 gpg Moderately hard
- Austin, TX 93 mg/L 5.4 gpg Moderately hard
- Washington, DC 95 mg/L 5.6 gpg Moderately hard
- Birmingham, AL 98 mg/L 5.7 gpg Moderately hard
- Kansas City, MO 100 mg/L 5.8 gpg Moderately hard
- Denver, CO 105 mg/L 6.1 gpg Moderately hard
- Tulsa, OK 114.5 mg/L 6.7 gpg Moderately hard
- Louisville, KY 115 mg/L 6.7 gpg Moderately hard
- Columbus, OH 120 mg/L 7 gpg Moderately hard
- Cleveland, OH 120 mg/L 7 gpg Moderately hard
- Philadelphia, PA 125 mg/L 7.3 gpg Hard
- Ann Arbor, MI 126 mg/L 7.4 gpg Hard
- Cincinnati, OH 133 mg/L 7.8 gpg Hard
- Milwaukee, WI 137 mg/L 8.01 gpg Hard
- St. Louis, MO 138 mg/L 8.1 gpg Hard
- Fort Worth, TX 145 mg/L 8.5 gpg Hard
- Honolulu, HI 162.5 mg/L 9.5 gpg Hard
- Wichita, KS 170 mg/L 9.9 gpg Hard
- Omaha, NE 170 mg/L 10 gpg Hard
- Los Angeles, CA 192 mg/L 11.2 gpg Very hard
- Lincoln, NE 192 mg/L 11.2 gpg Very hard
- Tampa, FL 220 mg/L 12.9 gpg Very hard
- Phoenix, AZ 237 mg/L 13.9 gpg Very hard
- Mesa, AZ 239.4 mg/L 14 gpg Very hard
- San Diego, CA 276 mg/L 16 gpg Very hard
- Las Vegas, NV 280 mg/L 16 gpg Very hard
- Chandler, AZ 282.2 mg/L 16.5 gpg Very hard
- San Antonio, TX 299.3 mg/L 17.5 gpg Very hard
- Anaheim, CA 300 mg/L 18 gpg Very hard
- Indianapolis, IN 317 mg/L 19 gpg Very hard
- Madison, WI 324.9 mg/L 19 gpg Very hard
- Scottsdale, AZ 352.5 mg/L 20.6 gpg Very hard
mg/L as calcium carbonate. Each classification band is drawn the same width, so the axis is not linear in mg/L.
Systems with similar published hardness
- Madison, WI Madison Water Utility, 324.9 mg/L (19 gpg)
- Indianapolis, IN Citizens Energy Group (Indianapolis), 317 mg/L (18.5 gpg)
- Anaheim, CA Anaheim Public Utilities, 300 mg/L (17.5 gpg)
- San Antonio, TX San Antonio Water System (SAWS), 299.3 mg/L (17.5 gpg)
All 44 verified systems How to find hardness in your own utility's report If you are on a well instead