Tampa, FL water hardness
City of Tampa Water Department publishes a hardness range of 140 to 300 mg/L for its system, on the page cited below. On the USGS scale that is very hard water, though the utility's own range crosses more than one class — it spans hard and very hard water from end to end.
The published figure, exactly as it appears
This is the hardness line transcribed from the source, with nothing added:
The hardness of Tampa's drinking water, primarily taken from the Hillsborough River, fluctuates throughout the year -- lower during the wet season and higher in the dry season -- between about 140 to 300 parts per million or 8 to 17 grains per gallon (one grain per gallon equals 17.2 parts per million).
City of Tampa Water Department
Units as published: parts per million, with grains per gallon given alongside. What kind of figure it is: a range with no average. Retrieved 2026-10-17.
Tampa hardness in mg/L and grains per gallon
Water-quality reports use mg/L (identical to ppm). Softener instructions and plumbing specifications use grains per gallon. Both are below. Where a figure is our arithmetic rather than the utility's own number, it says so.
| Figure | mg/L (ppm) | Grains per gallon | Whose number |
|---|---|---|---|
| Low end of published range | 140 | 8 | both published by the utility |
| High end of published range | 300 | 17 | both published by the utility |
| Plotted on the scale above | 220 | 12.9 | midpoint of the published range (no average is published); the gpg here is our conversion at 17.1, so it can differ slightly from a utility’s own rounded gpg figure |
The conversion, both ways: gpg = mg/L ÷ 17.1 and mg/L = gpg × 17.1. Worked for this system: 220 ÷ 17.1 = 12.9 gpg. The converter does °dH and °f as well, and why the factor is 17.1 explains where the number comes from.
What this figure does not tell you
Service area and source water
| Utility | City of Tampa Water Department |
|---|---|
| Service area as published | The City of Tampa Water Department's system. The fact sheet names no sub-area and no treatment plant. |
| Source water | Primarily the Hillsborough River, per the department's own fact sheet. |
Provenance of every number on this page
| Source document | City of Tampa Water Department, “Understanding Water Hardness” |
|---|---|
| Source URL | https://www.tampa.gov/sites/default/files/document/2026/understanding-water-hardness.pdf |
| Published by | City of Tampa Water Department |
| Report year | Not stated on the source page |
| Year note | The fact sheet states no year. The same passage appears on the department's Frequently Asked Questions page. |
| Retrieved | 2026-10-17 |
| Classification bands | USGS Water Science School, retrieved 2026-10-16 |
Notes the report forces on this page
- The department states the figure fluctuates seasonally — lower in the wet season, higher in the dry season — so this is a seasonal span rather than a sampling range at one point in time.
- Tampa prints its own conversion factor as “one grain per gallon equals 17.2 parts per million”. This site converts at 17.1 everywhere, so a grains figure worked here can differ slightly from one worked with Tampa's factor. Both of Tampa's own figures are shown as published.
- The published span crosses two USGS classes: 140 ppm is hard and 300 ppm is very hard.
If you are sizing a softener for Tampa water
At 12.9 gpg, the sizing arithmetic starts from your household's water use, not from the hardness alone. The calculator below is pre-filled with this system's figure and every other input is an editable assumption.
Whether a softener is worth installing at this hardness is a judgement, not arithmetic, and it is not one this site makes for you. Nothing here has been tested by the author.
Where Tampa sits against other verified systems
- Portland, OR 9 mg/L 0.5 gpg Soft
- Boston, MA 16 mg/L 1 gpg Soft
- Manchester, NH 17.9 mg/L 1 gpg Soft
- Raleigh, NC 25 mg/L 1.47 gpg Soft
- New York, NY 32 mg/L 2 gpg Soft
- Charlotte, NC 32 mg/L 1.9 gpg Soft
- Memphis, TN 46 mg/L 2.7 gpg Soft
- Anchorage, AK 56 mg/L 3.3 gpg Soft
- Oakland, CA 68.4 mg/L 4 gpg Moderately hard
- Nashville, TN 77.3 mg/L 4.5 gpg Moderately hard
- Sacramento, CA 83 mg/L 4.9 gpg Moderately hard
- Fresno, CA 89.3 mg/L 5.2 gpg Moderately hard
- Saint Paul, MN 90 mg/L 5 gpg Moderately hard
- Austin, TX 93 mg/L 5.4 gpg Moderately hard
- Washington, DC 95 mg/L 5.6 gpg Moderately hard
- Birmingham, AL 98 mg/L 5.7 gpg Moderately hard
- Kansas City, MO 100 mg/L 5.8 gpg Moderately hard
- Denver, CO 105 mg/L 6.1 gpg Moderately hard
- Tulsa, OK 114.5 mg/L 6.7 gpg Moderately hard
- Louisville, KY 115 mg/L 6.7 gpg Moderately hard
- Columbus, OH 120 mg/L 7 gpg Moderately hard
- Cleveland, OH 120 mg/L 7 gpg Moderately hard
- Philadelphia, PA 125 mg/L 7.3 gpg Hard
- Ann Arbor, MI 126 mg/L 7.4 gpg Hard
- Cincinnati, OH 133 mg/L 7.8 gpg Hard
- Milwaukee, WI 137 mg/L 8.01 gpg Hard
- St. Louis, MO 138 mg/L 8.1 gpg Hard
- Fort Worth, TX 145 mg/L 8.5 gpg Hard
- Honolulu, HI 162.5 mg/L 9.5 gpg Hard
- Wichita, KS 170 mg/L 9.9 gpg Hard
- Omaha, NE 170 mg/L 10 gpg Hard
- Los Angeles, CA 192 mg/L 11.2 gpg Very hard
- Lincoln, NE 192 mg/L 11.2 gpg Very hard
- Tampa, FL 220 mg/L 12.9 gpg Very hard
- Phoenix, AZ 237 mg/L 13.9 gpg Very hard
- Mesa, AZ 239.4 mg/L 14 gpg Very hard
- San Diego, CA 276 mg/L 16 gpg Very hard
- Las Vegas, NV 280 mg/L 16 gpg Very hard
- Chandler, AZ 282.2 mg/L 16.5 gpg Very hard
- San Antonio, TX 299.3 mg/L 17.5 gpg Very hard
- Anaheim, CA 300 mg/L 18 gpg Very hard
- Indianapolis, IN 317 mg/L 19 gpg Very hard
- Madison, WI 324.9 mg/L 19 gpg Very hard
- Scottsdale, AZ 352.5 mg/L 20.6 gpg Very hard
mg/L as calcium carbonate. Each classification band is drawn the same width, so the axis is not linear in mg/L.
Systems with similar published hardness
- Phoenix, AZ City of Phoenix Water Services Department, 237 mg/L (13.9 gpg)
- Mesa, AZ City of Mesa Water Resources, 239.4 mg/L (14 gpg)
- Los Angeles, CA Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, 192 mg/L (11.2 gpg)
- Lincoln, NE Lincoln Water System, 192 mg/L (11.2 gpg)
All 44 verified systems How to find hardness in your own utility's report If you are on a well instead